1 John 1 All

Home > The New Testament > First John > Verses 1:1-4
Previous page: First John                      Next page: Verses 1:6-10

This page would ideally always be under construction. You are invited to contribute.

Summary

This section should be very brief. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Discussion

This section is for detailed discussion such as the meaning of a symbol, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout a passage, or insights that can be further developed in the future. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

• 1 Jn 1:1. 1 John is labeled as an “epistle,” though from the outset it challenges this categorization. A normal epistle would begin with a prescript, where the sender identifies him or herself and then identifies the recipient. Paul’s epistles are good references on this literary custom. A typical example is the opening of 1 Corinthians: “Paul…and our brother Sosthenes, to the church of God that is in Corinth…” (1:1-2). But 1 John does not follow this convention at all. Neither the sender nor the recipients are identified. Instead, there is an opening declaration, a testimony of certain truths. In this sense, 1 John is not proper epistle. However, this commentary will refer to 1 John as an epistle in title only, not as a classification.

• 1 Jn 1:1: We declare to you … These words do not actually appear in the Greek, and the KJV reflects this feature. Most modern translators have added in this introductory sentence, or another like it, to soften the harsh beginning. It anticipates verse 3. Otherwise, it opens with five relative clauses and reads very stiffly. The JST also recognizes the abruptness of the original text and offers a smoother introduction: “Brethren, this is the testimony which we give of…” These first four verses present a complex grammatical declaration, difficult to follow even in English. Verses 1-4 make up one long sentence in Greek. The exegesis of these passages is extremely tricky, and there is certainly more than one way of reading them.

• 1 Jn 1:1: We… The difficulty of understanding the first Johannine epistle is complicated by the use of the first person plural throughout. Sometimes it refers to just the author(s), and sometimes it refers to the author(s) and the recipients. The testimony borne by this group is found also in the Gospel of John. In the concluding remarks of chapter 21 the group collectively testifies to the veracity of the work. Speaking of the Beloved Disciple, they write, “This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true” (21:24). The similar opening lines of 1 John let us know that it is not John himself who is writing, but a representative of the Johannine school, a group of his followers taught and trained in his teachings and style. The author is capable of using the first person singular “I” when he writes (e.g. 2:1). The opening testimonial is written by a single author, but given on behalf of the entire school.

• 1 Jn 1:1: …from the beginning… This opening phrase immediately recalls the opening lines of the Prologue to the Gospel and Genesis. These two texts refer to a primordial beginning that precedes the creation of the world. Others catchwords include “life,” “word,” and “light.” In the Gospel all of these refer to Jesus Christ, but in each case 1 John employs these terms for slightly different ends. The same is true for the understanding of “beginning.” The same phrase appears also in 1 John 3:11 and 2 John 5. In both cases, it does not refer to a cosmic event such as the one in Genesis or the Gospel of John. Rather, the “beginning” in the Johannine Epistles refers to the foundational events of the community, perhaps including the mortal ministry of Jesus Christ. The author seeks to recall the origins of the community. This rhetorical move establishes the writer’s authority as one who knows what has been “from the beginning,” and calls the community to remember these events. The writer makes a claim to truth that excludes the claims of the opponents about how things are supposed to be.

• 1 Jn 1:1: …what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands… Here, it seems, the author presents himself, on behalf of the school, as a historical witness to something. He emphasizes that he has experienced it audibly, visually, and palpably. The physicality and historicity of the events he is describing are meant to counter the claims of the opponents, who deny the fleshly reality of Jesus Christ. Again, the use of the first person plural refers to the collective experience of the school. The traditions of the Johannine community emphasized the material reality of Jesus at the time of the resurrection (John 20:27-9). The author is not necessarily a first hand participant in these events, but a keeper of the collective traditions of the school. He bears testimony of the experiences of those who have gone before him.

• 1 Jn 1:1: …the word of life… In the Prologue of the Gospel, the Word (logos) refers to the pre-incarnate Jesus. Many scholars, including the translators of the KJV, have similarly capitalized the reference to the “Word” in 1 John, thus attributing the same personal qualities to this “word” as the “Word” in the Gospel of John 1:1-4. The “Word of Life” is considered to be a title of Jesus. But this is not necessarily the most correct reading of the text. It is better to understand it as the “message” of life. The term for “word” is used in other constructions in the New Testament, like the “word of God” that follow this pattern. In Philippians 2:16, the “word of life” refers to the message of the gospel. This does not mean that it contradicts John 1:1-4, but that it has a different use in mind. The “word of life” is not the object of the previous relative clauses. In this passage, the word is not personified as it is in the Gospel. It is introduced by the preposition “concerning,” being mistranslated in the KJV as “of the Word of life.” In other Johannine passages, the “life” is the blessing given to believers. Perhaps the “life” is the result of the message of the “word.” Consider the “bread of life” (John 6:35), “light of life” (8:12), and “water of life” (Rev 21:6). Verse 2 clarifies even further. The Life refers to Christ, and his “word” is the gospel message, “the proclamation of Jesus’ person and ministry.”

• 1 Jn 1:2: …this life was revealed, and we have seen it and testify to it… Verse 2 is a parenthetical explanation of the “life” in verse 1. It is clear from this verse that it is not the “word” that is personified, but the “Life.” The Johannine tradition holds that they have seen and testify concerning this Life. In the Prologue to the Gospel, “life” is an attribute of the Word, “in him was life” (1:4). But later, Jesus declares, “I am the life” (John 11:25; 14:6). In the Johannine literature, Christ is “revealed.” The same verb is used to describe how Jesus appeared to the disciples at the resurrection (John 21:1, 14) and also describes his earthly ministry (John 1:31; 7:4).

• 1 Jn 1:2: …the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us… This clause finishes off the parenthetical statement. It also serves as further evidence that the Life, not the “word” is personified in 1 John. Here, the Life has pre-existence with the Father, just as the Word “was with the God” in John 1. The Life is called Eternal to indicate that this life comes from the realm or sphere of God. Life was revealed to them in the person of Jesus Christ.

The Gospel of John refers to God as “Father” more than all of the other Gospel writers combined. For Johannine community, the relationship between God and his children was intimate.

• 1 Jn 1:3: …we declare to you what we have seen and heard so that you also may have fellowship with us… The author resumes his introduction. He explains the purpose of his testimony. It is intended to persuade his audience to remain faithful to the Johannine tradition. He emphasizes “fellowship” as the ideal. The Greek word for “fellowship” (koinonia) connotes a close bond of unity. Unity is one of the primary themes of 1 John stresses the value of community or fellowship in order to strengthen his own community after the disruptive schism (see 2:19).

• 1 Jn 1:3: …truly our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ… The Johannine school shares the intimate relationship with divinity that it encourages among its members. Again, “fellowship” is seen as the ideal relationship of unity. This verse also teaches the divine heritage of Jesus Christ.

• 1 Jn 1:4: …We are writing these things so that our joy may be complete. The KJV reads “write we unto you that your joy…” However, in light of better manuscript evidence this tradition is no longer supported. The dative case “unto you” in later copies of the text on which the KJV is based had replaced an earlier emphatic “we”. Additionally, the reading of “your joy” is also a later addition. “Our joy” is preferred. The text promises a fulfillment of joy to those who will obtain fellowship with the community and with God.

Unanswered questions

This section is for questions along the lines of "I still don't understand ..." Please do not be shy. The point of these questions is to identify things that still need to be addressed on this page. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Prompts for life application

This section is for prompts that suggest ways in which a passage can influence a person's life. Prompts may be appropriate either for private self reflection or for a class discussion. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Prompts for further study

This section is for prompts that invite us to think about a passage more deeply or in a new way. These are not necessarily questions that beg for answers, but rather prompts along the lines of "Have you ever thought about ..." Prompts are most helpful when they are developed individually, thoughtfully, and with enough background information to clearly indicate a particular direction for further study or thought. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

• First John. What kind of a document is this?

• First John. What relationship does this text have to other Johannine literature, especially the Gospel of John?

• 1 Jn 1:4. Who is the "we" that is bearing testimony?

Resources

This section is for listing links and print resources, including those that are also cited elsewhere on this page. A short comment about the particular strengths of a resource can be helpful. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Notes

Footnotes are not required but are encouraged for factual assertions that average readers cannot easily evaluate for themselves (such as the date of King Solomon’s death or the nuanced definition of a Greek word). In contrast, insights rarely benefit from footnoting, and the focus of this page should always remain on the scriptures themselves rather than what someone has said about them. Links are actively encouraged on all sections of this page, and links to authoritative sources (such as Strong's Bible Concordance or the Joseph Smith Papers) are preferable to footnotes.

Previous page: First John                      Next page: Verses 1:6-10

Home > The New Testament > First John > Verses 1:5-10
Previous page: Verses 1:1-4                      Next page: 1 Jn 2:1-6

This page would ideally always be under construction. You are invited to contribute.

Summary

This section should be very brief. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Discussion

This section is for detailed discussion such as the meaning of a symbol, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout a passage, or insights that can be further developed in the future. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

• 1 Jn 1:5: …the message… The root of this word (angelia) is shared by the word for “gospel” (euangelia). The euangelia is the “good message.” The point that follows is emphasized by the use of this word. The use of the definite article also puts weight on the teaching. The active verb used here, “to proclaim” (anangelien) also derives from the same root.

• 1 Jn 1:5: …we have heard from him and proclaim to you … The antecedent to the pronoun “him” is not immediately clear. Does it refer to the Father or Jesus Christ? Most likely, the message which they have heard from the beginning refers to the preaching of Jesus during his mortal ministry.

• 1 Jn 1:5: …God is light… This is the message that receives special attention. The text does not say that this is a quotation of Jesus, but rather that this is the substance of his teaching. There is no exact parallel saying known from any other source of Jesus’ life. In John’s Gospel, Jesus declares, “I am the light” (8:12; cf. 1:4-5, 7-9; 3:19; 12:35, 46). This is one example of the difference between the two texts. Often where the Gospel is Christocentric, the Epistle is theocentric. But this analysis fails to uncover the different ways that the Gospel and the Epistle understand the concept of light.

The claim that God is light is not intended to make any philosophical claim of God’s essence, nor to define God cosmic being. It is not making a metaphysical claim, but an ethical one. Other “God is…” sayings are found in both the Gospel and the Epistle. Compare “God is spirit” (John 4:24) and “God is love” (1 John 4:8). These “God is…” sayings are not meant to define God, but to define what God is to humanity.

There is a key difference between the way that the Gospel uses the term “light” and how the Epistle uses it. The Gospel takes part in a tradition in which the “light” is a cosmic character. In Gen 1:3 God creates “light.” This light is unique because it is not associated with any of the heavenly bodies, namely the sun, moon, and stars. Many ancient interpreters believed that this light was created to make it possible for God to see while he was working. Philo equates this light with the image of the Word (logos), explaining, “it was a light higher than the stars, the source of the starlight that can be seen.” For Philo, the divine hierarchy begins with God, then the Word, and then Light. Aristobulus, another Jewish philosopher, explains that this light illuminates all of creation: “…the first [day], the one in which the light was born by which all things are seen together.” The Prologue of the Gospel tells a similar story of the Word, comparing the Word to the Light: “In him was life, and the life was the light of all people…the true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world” (John 1:4, 9). The Gospel sees Christ as the pre-existent cosmic light of creation that enters the world in the human form of Jesus.

The Epistle does not rely on the same interpretation of the cosmic light as the Gospel. Instead, it understands light and darkness in ethical terms. The next verses (1:6-10) give claims and counterclaims about morality and sin. The statement “God is light” introduces these sections. A cosmic being is not implied. Instead, light and dark, or “walking in light” and “walking in darkness” are metaphors for righteous conduct within the context of an ethical dualism. These shades represent “two ways” between which believers must choose.

• 1 Jn 1:5: …and in him there is no darkness at all… The pattern of a positive statement followed by a negative one that continues the same thesis can be found in other biblical texts (Deut 32:4; Ps 92:16). Both these biblical examples emphasize God’s righteousness. 1 John uses light and darkness as symbols of ethical dualism.

• 1 Jn 1:6: …If we say that we have fellowship with him… This is the first of three “if” statements in this section that 1 John will refute. The others are “if we say we have no sin” and “if we say we have not sinned.” These may be directed against the opponents who have left the community (2:19). Perhaps they claimed to have a special relationship with God and to live without sin. However, these sayings need not be read as adversarial. Rather, the “if” statements are meant to encourage and exhort the author’s own community to remain vigilant about their own righteousness and to avoid complacency after having survived a tragedy in the community. Again, fellowship is the ideal relationship with God. It is not impossible to have fellowship with God. Rather, one cannot claim to have fellowship with him as long as he is living unrighteously. Though there is reference to many commandments (2:3), only the command to “love one another” is mentioned explicitly. These antitheses set up the exhortation to remain united in love.

• 1 Jn 1:6: … while we are walking in darkness… The statements about walking in light and darkness come close to the similar style of ethical preaching found in the Community Rule of the DSS. The Rule depicts the world as inhabited by the “sons of light” and the “sons of darkness.” There are those that “walk in the ways of light” and those that “walk in the ways of darkness” (1QS 3:20-1). The same ethical dualism underlies the arguments in both 1 John and the Community Rule. Just as the readers of 1 John are instructed to love one another, the readers of the Rule are instructed to “love the sons of light” (1QS 1:9). I do not suggest that 1 John is copying the Community Rule, or even that he read it. Rather, the motif of ethical dualism depicted as the division between light and darkness is a part of the cultural milieu of both writings.

• 1 Jn 1:6: … we lie and do not do what is true… The claim to have fellowship with God while not fulfilling the commandment of love violates the person’s integrity in both speech and action. The believer must have consistency between telling the truth and doing the truth. The reference here to “truth” (aletheia) is the first in the Epistle. Almost half of the uses of this word in the New Testament come from the Johannine literature. It becomes a quasi-technical term synonymous with the light.

• 1 Jn 1:7 …but if we walk in the light… This statement must be coupled with the above claim that “God is light.” To walk in the light is to walk in God. The Community Rule in the DSS uses a similar phrase to describe righteous behavior: “the children of Light are ruled by the Prince of Light and walk in the ways of light” (1 QS 3:20).

• 1 Jn 1:7 … as he himself is in the light… The pronoun “he” refers to God. But this statement seems awkward with the previous claim that “God is light.” How can God be both light and be in the light? The statements function toward the same end, but in different ways. The claim that “God is light” is not a metaphysical proposition, but a metaphorical lesson. “Light” is understood as righteousness, of which God is the supreme example. Here, the light is righteousness. God is in the light because he dwells in righteousness.

The preposition “in” is found frequently in Johannine literature. The phrases “to be in” and “to dwell in” create a motif of “indwelling.” This motif describes the Spirit in the believer, Jesus in the Father, the Father in Jesus, and the believer in God and Jesus.

• 1 Jn 1:7 … we have fellowship with one another… Again, the theme of fellowship is repeated. The way to achieve this goal is by walking in the light. Loving one another is the subtext for what it means to walk in the light.

• 1 Jn 1:7 … and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin… The blessings of the atonement of Jesus are promised to those who walk in the light. It emphasizes the healing powers of the atonement for those who have already come into the light but yet have sinned (3:20-1). The text on which the KJV is based adds the word “Christ” to say “Jesus Christ” but more authoritative manuscripts leave this out. The notions of cleansing and blood mentioned here draw upon the language of sacrifice. The death of Jesus is seen as a purifying sacrifice on behalf of those who walk in the light. In Judaic sacrifices in the temple, it was not the death of the animal, but the sprinkling of the blood that cleansed the holy instruments. The emphasis in 1 John on the cleansing power of the blood of Christ has more in common with Revelation than the Gospel.

• 1 Jn 1:8 …If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us… This is the second “if” statement that 1 John refutes. He argues that no one is free from the stains of sin. 1 John spends a great deal of time discussing sin, mentioning it as many times as the Gospel of John. This statement reflects the universal state of sinfulness for all of humanity, including the believers. It is a reminder that no one can claim to be perfect. No one has the right to say that they are free from sin. We are thus dependent on the atonement of Jesus Christ in order to be cleansed continually. The sin that 1 John is concerned with is not having love for one another. For 1 John, this violation of fellowship is very serious. The strength of the community of believers is vital to one’s own standing before God.

• 1 Jn 1:9 …If we confess our sins, he who is faithful and just will forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness… We are instructed to confess our sins in order to receive forgiveness. The text does not specify the nature of confession. Was there an ecclesiastical confession, was confession a public activity, or performed privately between God and the believer? For Latter-day Saints, all three types are requisite for repentance.

• 1 Jn 1:10 …If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us… This is the third “if” statement in this section that 1 John refutes. The statement is meant to drive home the point that all have sinned and are in need of the atonement. This statement closely parallels verse 8, which is directed against those who say “we have no sin.” The difference is that the third statement is in the past tense. This time, instead of deceiving ourselves as verse 8 warned, we make God a liar. God has sent his son to cleanse the world from sin. To deny the existence of sin is to deny the need for the atonement. The parallel between this verse and verse 8 is also changed in the last phrase. Whereas in verse 8 the consequence of our saying that we have not sinned is that “truth” is not us it, but here it is “his word” that is not in us. Both terms are important for the Johannine community

Unanswered questions

This section is for questions along the lines of "I still don't understand ..." Please do not be shy. The point of these questions is to identify things that still need to be addressed on this page. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Prompts for life application

This section is for prompts that suggest ways in which a passage can influence a person's life. Prompts may be appropriate either for private self reflection or for a class discussion. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Prompts for further study

This section is for prompts that invite us to think about a passage more deeply or in a new way. These are not necessarily questions that beg for answers, but rather prompts along the lines of "Have you ever thought about ..." Prompts are most helpful when they are developed individually, thoughtfully, and with enough background information to clearly indicate a particular direction for further study or thought. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Resources

This section is for listing links and print resources, including those that are also cited elsewhere on this page. A short comment about the particular strengths of a resource can be helpful. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →

Notes

Footnotes are not required but are encouraged for factual assertions that average readers cannot easily evaluate for themselves (such as the date of King Solomon’s death or the nuanced definition of a Greek word). In contrast, insights rarely benefit from footnoting, and the focus of this page should always remain on the scriptures themselves rather than what someone has said about them. Links are actively encouraged on all sections of this page, and links to authoritative sources (such as Strong's Bible Concordance or the Joseph Smith Papers) are preferable to footnotes.

Previous page: Verses 1:1-4                      Next page: 1 Jn 2:1-6